Patches for bugs introduced in 2.4 and 2.5 releases#187
Merged
missinglink merged 2 commits intopelias:masterfrom Jun 23, 2025
Merged
Patches for bugs introduced in 2.4 and 2.5 releases#187missinglink merged 2 commits intopelias:masterfrom
missinglink merged 2 commits intopelias:masterfrom
Conversation
Joxit
requested changes
Apr 26, 2025
Member
|
@Joxit this looks good to me, should we merge this? |
Joxit
approved these changes
Jun 23, 2025
Member
|
Hi, sorry I forgot this PR 🙈 IIRC everything was fine when I did my review. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Here's the reason for this change 🚀
Versions 2.4.0 and 2.5.0 respectively introduced some issues, making certain kinds of input either unparseable or unsuitable for geocoding.
Demo links:
Here's what actually got changed 👏
dictionaries/nb/concatenated_suffixes_separable.txt. This appears to be significantly interfering with Spanish addresses.Here's how others can test the changes 👀
I've added unit tests for both cases. Additionally, I swapped in the branch for the pelias API and verified that all tests pass there. I actually discovered this while tinkering with some other things and realizing that like 100 API tests (slightly inflated in scope since it's char by char searches) fail as-is ☠️
I think longer term it'd probably be a good idea to harmonize that code and testing process a bit. Right now it's disjoint because the API has a second layer of processing logic on top of this lib, and that complicates testing, which is probably why these have been lurking.